Time Dilation

The distance

Let us now synchronize the two clocks so that the light pulses in both clocks leave the top mirror at precisely

We now invoke the speed of light postulate, which requires the light pulses in both clocks to
move at precisely the same
speed relative to *O* and hence travel the same distance in the given time interval. Hence, the light pulse in the clock
attached to *O* also has traveled a distance *D*, and has already bounced off the bottom mirror by the time the clock in *O'* ticks one second. An observer in *O* therefore concludes that the clock
attached to *O'* is running slow.

This is a very startling result. It says that two identical clocks
that run at precisely the same rate when compared in the same
reference frame will appear to disagree when viewed from different
frames: time is not absolute, but depends on the frame of reference of
the observer. This conclusion seems even more bizarre if one recalls that the relativity of
motion postulate does not allow us to discern which of the two
observers is actually in motion.
If we repeat the above argument, but from
the point of view of an observer moving with *O'* , we will be lead to precisely the same
conclusion, only in reverse. An observer in *O'* sees
the light pulse of the clock in *O* travels along a diagonal *D*and is forced to conclude that the clock in *O* is running slowly.
Each observer therefore thinks that it is the other clock that is running slowly, and
there is no sense in which we can claim that one clock or the other is the
culprit.
Time itself
is relative.

It is not difficult to get a quantitative expression relating the time
elapsed on *O*'s clock to that of *O'*. The distance between the mirrors, *d*is related to the time *t'* measure by *O'* according to *d* = *ct'*, where
*c*, as usual is the speed of light. (We are using the fact that displacement = (velocity `x` time).) Since the
speed of light is precisely the same for both observers, the time *t* elapsed in that frame is related to the distance *D* traveled relative to *O* by a similar relation:
*D* = *ct*. Using the Pythagorean theorem relating the sides of a right
triangle, we know that
*D*^{2} = *d*^{2} + (*vt*)^{2}. When we substitute the expressions for
*D* and *d* in terms of the corresponding times, we get the desired relationship:

There are several important things to notice about the time dilation factor. First of all, no matter what the velocity is, is always greater than one, so the clocks always appears to run slower when observed by someone in a different (uniformly moving frame.

Secondly,
depends only on (*v*/*c*)^{2}, the square of the ratio of the relative
velocity *v* to the speed of light *c*. Hence it doesn't care about
whether *v* is positive or negative (i.e. whether the motion is to the
right or to the left).
Moreover, when *v* is much less than
*c*, the ratio *v*^{2}/*c*^{2} is much less then one. In this case the denominator in
11.6
is very nearly equal to one, and so is . This explains why the
bizarre consequences of Special Relativity do not affect our
daily lives. We do not regularly experience relative velocities
anywhere near 300 million meters per second. At the more Earthly speed
of 100 km/hr, or about 30 m/s, the ratio
*v*/*c* is 30 divided by 30 million, or one millionth. The square of a
very small number is smaller still. In this case
*v*^{2}/*c*^{2} = 10^{-12}and consequently, the time dilation factor differs from one by only
one part in 10^{12}. This is clearly too small to be detectable. We
can now understand why many of the predictions of
special relativity are counter-intuitive. Our
intuition is based on low velocity experiences. If there is a life
form somewhere in the Universe that regularly travels at near light
speeds, its intuition would lead to very different conclusions.

The time dilation factor is only relevant when the relative velocity is
a significant fraction of the speed of light. For example, if *v* = *c*/2 (i.e.
one half the speed of
light), the time dilation factor
is
1/
or approximately 1.2. In this case an observer in
*O* sees the
clock in
*O'* run 20 % slower. Conversely, an observer moving with
*O'* will see the clock in *O* running 20% slower.

One final important feature of the time dilation factor is that as the relative velocity gets near the speed of light, the denominator nears zero, and expression for blows up: dividing by zero gives infinity. This suggests that something strange happens as velocities approach the speed of light. We will have more to say about this a bit later.

To understand the true significance of all this, one must keep in mind that time dilation does not apply only to the special types of clocks I described above. In fact, all physical processes appear to slow down when view from a different uniformly moving frame. This effect has been verified experimentally in many contexts. One of these involves elementary particles called muons, which are created when high energy cosmic rays hit the upper atmosphere. These muons are unstable and normally decay into a different form of matter within about two microseconds (two millionths of a second). The muons created by cosmic rays plummet towards the Earth at very high speeds, typically of the order of 99% of the speed of light. At this speed they should be able to travel a distance of (300 million meters/second times .000002 seconds ) or 600 meters. Hence they should decay somewhere in the upper atmosphere. What is observed, however, is that the muons get significantly closer to the Earth's surface than the above argument suggests. In fact, some of them hit the Earth.

The explanation comes from Special Relativity. In accordance with the time dilation effect, the physical process responsible for muon decay appears to be running slowly when viewed from the Earth. If the muon is moving at a velocity of .99c, the time dilation factor is about 7. Thus, to an observer on Earth, the muon appears to live seven times longer (about 14 microseconds instead of just 2). It therefore can travel seven times further (over 4 kilometers), and traverses most of the atmosphere before decaying.

1999-09-29